The Importance of Dignity & Choice
Lesson Objectives
Appreciate the problem of Moral Monism endemic to Kantian Deontology
Appreciate the benefits of seeing moral duties through a pluralist lens
Understand how the Philosophy of Autonomy changed after Kant
Appreciate how we define Autonomy in a Contemporary Framework
Understand the various preconditions for Acting with Autonomy
Understand the moral values of Respect and Consent in a Modern Context
Key Terms
Monism & Pluralism
Prima Facie Duties
Moral Autonomy
Moral Competence
Consent
Monism: Kant's Problem
Kantian Deotology: Clear & Objective
• Kantian Deontology more clear than Aristotle (virtue) & Aquinas (natural law)
• Duty-based ethics applies to everyone, regardless of circumstance
• Objective and easier to apply to a wider range of issues
• Moral laws are universal and unchanging
• Kantian Deontology emphasizes our moral obligations
• Actions have moral worth when done from a sense of duty
• People are obligated to act in ways that respect the moral law
• Kantian Deontology shows massive respect for human autonomy
• People are rational beings with inherent worth and dignity
• They should be treated as ends in themselves, not as means to an end
• People have the freedom to choose and act on their own moral beliefs
• Moral autonomy requires people to take responsibility for their actions
What about Conflicting Moral Duties?
• Kant's emphasis on duty and universalizable maxims leads to conflicts
• Examples of Conflicting Moral Duties in Deontology
• Lying to save a life vs. telling the truth to authorities
• Respecting patient confidentiality vs. warning others of danger
• Keeping a promise vs. revealing a friend's infidelity
• Following orders vs. upholding civil rights
How to Resolve conflicting Moral Duties in Deontology?
• Kantian Deontology provides no clear resolution
• Alternative ethical frameworks like Moral Pluralism may offer solutions
Monism & Pluralism
• Moral Monism: there is one overriding rule about morality (eg. Cat. Imperative)
• Monism claims our absolute moral rules are fundamental
• So: Do I tell the truth, or lie to the authorities to save a life?
• Monism is unable to deal with moral contradictions
• We need more nuance than just "a duty to be honest" no matter what
• Moral Pluralism: there are multiple moral goods, so a plurality of moral values should be simultaneously considered when making moral decisions
• Pluralism simultaneously considers multiple moral values
• Pluralism is flexible, offering a context-specific approach to ethics
• No single ethical solution will satisfy every moral obligation